What does peer coaching research in Türkiye say? A content analysis study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12509208Keywords:
Coaching, Peer coaching, Professional development, Content analysis, Meta synthesisAbstract
This study aims to determine the trends of the research on peer coaching in Türkiye and to perform a meta-synthesis of the research results. Descriptive content analysis and meta-synthesis methods were used in the study. To collect data, a research review form on peer coaching prepared by the researcher was used. The research data were analyzed using the categorical analysis technique, one of the types of content analysis. To collect data, a research review form on peer coaching prepared by the researcher was used. The research data were analyzed using the categorical analysis technique, one of the types of content analysis. According to the findings of the research, the aims of determining the effects of coaching skills on teacher competencies, teaching, and student achievement, and determining the relationship between coaching skills and different variables were emphasized in the studies. The most used keywords in the studies were coaching, coach, peer coaching, leadership, teacher, professional development, and teacher education. According to the subject areas, research is mostly concentrated on coaching skills and coaching practices. It was determined that the research in which teachers at all levels participated, quantitative-based, quantitative data collection tools, and many data analysis methods were intensely used. According to the results of the research, it was determined that there are many research results that colleague coaching improves teachers' professional skills. Moreover, it was determined that teachers' coaching skills differed according to the variables addressed in the studies. In addition, it was concluded that coaching skills are related to many variables. In line with the results of the research, it is recommended to conduct experimental studies to determine the effect of coaching skills on student achievement at primary and secondary school level. In addition, considering the limited research on coaching roles and coaching competencies, it is recommended that new research be conducted on these issues.
References
Aktan, O., & Eğdemir, Y. (2022). Türkiye’de lisansüstü eğitim konulu çalışmaların incelenmesi: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Analysis of Postgraduate Education Studies in Turkey: A Content Analysis Study]. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 182-195. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.985819
Aktan, O., & Tekin, M. (2023). Araştırma soruları, hipotez, veri ve değişkenler [Research questions, hypothesis, data and variables]. A. Ilgan & S. Üztemur (Ed.), Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntemleri [Research Methods in Education] (p. 103-132). Nobel.
Alper, A., & Gülbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of recent research in TOJET. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 8 (2), 124-135. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505942.pdf
Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A., & Hite, C. E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97–117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478748
Athanasopoulou, A., & Dopson, S. (2018). A systematic review of executive coaching outcomes: Is it the journey or the destination that matters the most? The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.11.004
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Basturk, R. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin hizmetiçi eğitime yönelik algı ve beklentilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of Elementary School Teachers’ Perceptions And Expectations About In-Service Education]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 96-107. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/87268
Bayar, A. (2014). The Components of effective professional development activities in terms of teachers' perspective. Online Submission, 6(2), 319-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2014.02.006.
Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1
Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55, 735-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
Béteille, T. & Evans, D., 2021. Successful Teachers, Successful Students: Recruiting and Supporting Society’s Most Crucial Profession. World Bank, Washington, DC. United States of America. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2445925/successful-teachers-successful-students/3467666/ on 17 Dec 2023. CID: 20.500.12592/d5wh8w.
Bilgin, O. (2019). Türkiye’de özgüven ile ilgili yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [Investigation of the Postgraduate Theses Performed on Self-Confidence in Turkey]. OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(20), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.590461
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 7(2), 548-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0.
Bruns, B., Costa, L., & Cunha, N. (2018). Through the looking glass: Can classroom observation and coaching improve teacher performance in Brazil?. Economics of Education Review, 64, 214-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.003
Bumen, N. T., Ates, A., Cakar, E., Ural, G., & Acar, V. (2012). Türkiye bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi: sorunlar ve öneriler [Teachers' Professional Development in Turkish Context: Issues and Suggestions]. Milli Eğitim, Bahar 194, 31-50. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/442293
Buyukozturk, Ş., Kılıc Cakmak, E., Akgun, O.E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (25th ed). Pegem.
Caires, S., & Almeida, L. S. (2005). Teaching practice in Initial Teacher Education: its impact on student teachers' professional skills and development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470500127236
Can, E. (2019). Öğretmenlerin meslekî gelişimleri: Engeller ve öneriler [Professional development of teachers: obstacles and suggestions]. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi – Journal Of Qualitative Research In Education, 7(4), 1618-1650. https://doi.org/10.14689/Issn.2148-2624.1.7c.4s.14m.
Cañadas, L. (2023). Contribution of formative assessment for developing teaching competences in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 516-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1950684
Ceylan, V. K., & Gundogdu, K. (2017). Öğretmenlerin e-içerik geliştirme becerileri: Bir hizmet içi eğitim deneyimi [E-Content development skills of teachers: An in-service training experienc]. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 8(15), 48-74. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/360782.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). Routledge Falmer.
Dalton, S. S. (2007). Five standards for effective teaching: How to succeed with all learners, grades K-8. John Wiley & Sons.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81-92.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/media/476/download?inline&file=Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of rofessi’ rofessional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Desimone L. M. & Garet M. S. (2015). Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7, 252–263. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ual.es/bitstream/handle/10835/3930/Desimone%20En%20ingles.pdf?se
Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory into practice, 56(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5.
Devine, M., Meyers, R., & Houssemand, C. (2013). How can coaching make a positive impact within educational settings?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1382-1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.048.
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and learning, 3, 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
Dogan, H., & Tok, T. N. (2018). Türkiye’de eğitim bilimleri alanında yayınlanan makalelerin incelenmesi: Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi örneği [Analysis of the Articles Published in the Field of Educational Sciences in Turkey: An Example of Education and Science Journal]. Current Research in Education, 4(2), 94-109. Retrieved from https://aizonia.com/uploads/__dokuman/cre-tum-sayi/4-2-full-file.pdf
Dunst, C.J., Bruder, M.B. & Hamby, D.W. (2015). Metasynthesis of in-service Professional development research: Features associated with positive educator and student outcomes. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(12), 1731-1744. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2306
Erdem, M. & Ilgan, A. (2011). Meslektaş koçluğu [Peer coaching]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 119-136.
Eroglu, M., & Ozbek, R. (2020). Etkili öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi [Professional Development of Effective Teachers]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(37), 73-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.2020.142
Fry, J. M., & Hin, M. K. T. (2006). Peer coaching with interactive wireless technology between student rofessi: Satisfaction with role and communication. Interactive learning environments, 14(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820600852969
Hagen, M. S., Bialek, T. K., & Peterson, S. L. (2017). The rofes of peer coaching: definitions, goals, processes and outcomes. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(6), 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2017-0031
Hark Soylemez, N., & Adıyaman, B. (2023). Türk Eğitim Sistemi ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaların değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the Studies on the Turkish Education System]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(239), 1673-1706. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1156383
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, rofess quality and student achievement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 798-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
Hauge, K. & Wan, P. (2019). Teachers’ rofession rofessional development in school: a rofes study. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1619223.
Hooker, T. (2013). Peer coaching: A rofes of the rofession. Waikato Journal of Education, 18(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v18i2.166
Hsieh, F. P., Lin, H. S., Liu, S. C., & Tsai, C. Y. (2021). Effect of peer coaching on rofessi’ practice and their students’ scientific competencies. Research in Science Education, 51, 1569-1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9839-7
Hunzicker, J. (2011). Effective rofessional development for rofessi: A checklist. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 177179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.523955
Ilgan, A. (2021). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi üzerine kavramsal bir çerçeve ve Türk eğitim sistemi için çıkarımlar [A Conceptual Frame about Professional Development of Teachers and Implications for Turkish Education System.] Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 35(1), 256-280. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2021351225
Jao, L. (2013). Peer-coaching as a model for rofessional development in the elementary mathematics context: challenges, needs and rewards. Policy Futures in Education, 11(3), 290-298 https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.29
Jenkins, J. M., Hamrick, C., & Todorovich, J. (2002). Peer coaching implementation and data-collection tools. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73(4), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2002.10607791
Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2018). Peer coaching in education. In S. Zepeda, and J. Ponticell, The Wiley handbook of educational supervision (pp. 307-328). Wiley Publishing.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
Guskey, T.R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
Gungor, B. A., & Saracoglu, S. (2023). Fen eğitiminde bağlam temelli öğrenme yaklaşımı konulu tezlerin içerik analizi [Content Analysis of Theses on Context-Based Learning Approach in Science Education]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 13(2), 564-598. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1118396
Karadag, R. (2014). Okuma ilgisi, tutumları ve alışkanlığı konusunda yapılmış çalışmaların lisansüstü tezlere dayalı analizi: YÖK ve ProQuest veri tabanları örneklemi [Analysis of the graduate theses in the field of reading interest, attitudes and habits: The sample of YOK and ProQuest Databases]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(35), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE619
Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method] (31.baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International journal of STEM education, 5, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Keiler, L. S., Diotti, R., Hudon, K., & Ransom, J. C. (2020). The role of feedback in teacher mentoring: how coaches, peers, and students affect teacher change. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(2), 126-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1749345
Kıranlı Gungor, S., & Gungor, M. (2020). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim alanında yapılmış doktora tezlerinin analizi [Analysis of Ph. D. Theses Written in the Field of Higher Education in Turkey]. Turkish Studies - Education, 15(1), 481-505. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.39645
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of educational research, 88(4), 547-588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Krell, M., Khan, S., Vergara, C., Cofré, H., Mathesius, S., & Krüger, D. (2023). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Competencies: Analysing the Impact of Contributing Factors. Research in Science Education, 53(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10045-x
Kohler, F. W., Crilley, K. M., Shearer, D. D., & Good, G. (1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(4), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1997.10544578
Kosar, D., Er, E., Kılınc, A. Ç., & Kosar, S. (2017). Öğretmen liderliğine ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Analysis of Teacher Leadership Studies: A Content Analysis Study]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(7), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.317712
Kosar, D. (2020). Analysis of organizational trust studies conducted in Turkey: A content analysis. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 10(2), 355-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.012
Kurtts, S. A., & Levin, B. B. (2000). Using peer coaching with preservice teachers to develop reflective practice and collegial support. Teaching Education, 11(3), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698980
Lam, T. P., Irwin, M., Chow, L. W. C., & Chan, P. (2002). Early introduction of clinical skills teaching in a medical curriculum–factors affecting students' learning. Medical education, 36(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01142.x
Leary, H., & Walker, A. (2018). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis methodologies: Rigorously piecing together research. TechTrends, 62(5), 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0312-7
Lu, H. L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education–A review of literature. Teaching and teacher education, 26(4), 748-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.015
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
Medley, D. (1979). Teacher competence and teacher effectiveness: A review ofprocess product research. New York, NY: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Committee on Performance-Based Teacher Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED143629.pdf
Michalca, L. & Miclea, M. (2007). Current Trends in Educational Technology Research. Cognition Brain & Behavior, XI, (1), 115-129. Retrieved from https://research.ebsco.com/c/zwecik/viewer/pdf/ojo67twqh5
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Genişletilmiş bir kaynak kitap: Nitel veri analizi [An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis] (S. Akbaba Altun ve A. Ersoy, Çeviri Edts). Pegem.
Nazli, G., Zorluoglu, S. L., & Kasıkcı, E. (2023). Bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programı ile ilgili çalışmaların eğilimleri: İçerik analizi [Trends of studies related to şndividualized education program: Content analysis]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(238), 713-744. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1099155
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.
Nguyen, H. C. (2019). An investigation of professional development among educational policy-makers, institutional leaders and teachers. Management in Education, 33(1), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618781678.
Nye, E., Melendez‐Torres, G. J., & Bonell, C. (2016). Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta‐synthesis. Review of Education, 4(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3065.
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 results combined executive summaries volume I, II & III. Paris: OECD Publishing
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Orakci, Ş. (2023). Türkiye’deki bilişsel esneklik konulu makalelerin incelenmesi: Bir betimsel içerik analizi çalışması [Analysis of articles on cognitive flexibility in Türkiye: A descriptive content analysis]. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(40), 1484-1507. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1275536
Othman, N., & Yee, C. S. (2015). Empowering teaching, learning, and supervision through coaching in action research. Journal of Management Research, 7(2), 98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v7i2.6931.
Ozan, C., & Kose, E. (2014). Eğitim programları ve öğretim alanındaki araştırma eğilimleri [Research Trends in Curriculum and Instruction]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.76547
Oner, O. &Turkoglu, M. E. (2020). Eğitim denetimi alanındaki lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [Examination of postgraduate theses in the field of educational supervision]. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(39), 1265-1285. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.798949
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Patton, K., Parker, M., & Tannehill, D. (2015). Helping teachers help themselves: Professional development that makes a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 99(1), 26-42.https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636515576040
Peterson, S. M., Valk, C., Baker, A. C., Brugger, L., & Hightower, A. D. (2010). “We’re not just interested in the work”: Social and emotional aspects of early educator mentoring relationships. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611261003678895
Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational research, 54(4), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725.
Richard, M. M. (2021). The impact of micro teaching lessons on teacher professional skills: Some reflections from south African student teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p164
Reese, S. (2010). Bringing effective professional development to educators. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers (J1), 85(6), 38-43. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ909588.pdf
Rhodes, C., & Beneicke, S. (2002). Coaching, mentoring and peer-networking: Challenges for the management of teacher professional development in schools. Journal of in-service education, 28(2), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580200200184
Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'education, 17, 51-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495395
Sarac, H. (2017). Türkiye’de okul dışı öğrenme ortamlarına ilişkin yapılan araştırmalar: İçerik analizi çalışması [Researches related to outdoor learning environments in Turkey: Content analysis study]. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 60-81.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). Sage.
Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing.
Selvi, K. (2010). Teachers’ competencies. Cultura International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 7(1), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.5840/cultura20107133
Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53, 12-16.
Sicak, A., & Parmaksiz, R. S. (2016). İlköğretim kurumlarındaki mesleki çalışmaların etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of efficacy of in-service training in primary schools]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.17144668
Sider, S. (2019) Peer coaching in a school in Cairo, Egypt: Implementation, barriers, and pathways to effective adoption. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 8(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE04-2018-0016
Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review. School effectiveness and school improvement, 32(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
Soisangwarn, A., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Promoting the reflective teacher through peer coaching to improve teaching skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2504-2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.601
Sonmez, N. & Ozcan, B.(2020). Türkiye’de ilkokulda kaynaştırma eğitimiyle ilgili yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin betimsel incelemesi [A descriptive analysisof the graduate theses in Turkey related to inclusive education in Primary School]. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 34(1),1-27 https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2020341121
Snyder, P. A., Hemmeter, M. L., & Fox, L. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in early childhood special education, 35(3), 133-143.https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415594925
Üztemur, S. & Gokalp, A. (2023). Nicel araştırma ve tarama araştırması (Survey Research). A.İlğan & S.Üztemur (Ed.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri [Research methods in education ] (p. 211-243). Nobel Publisher.
van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2012). Coaching in education: Getting better results for students, educators, and parents. Karnac Books.
Vidmar, D. J. (2005). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research strategies, 20(3), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resstr.2006.06.002.
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
Walsh, N. R., Ginger, K., & Akhavan, N. (2020). Benefits of instructional coaching for teacher efficacy: A mixed methods study with PreK-6 teachers in California. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 1143-1161. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.465507539570063
Yang, W., Huang, R., Su, Y., Zhu, J., Hsieh, W. Y., & Li, H. (2022). Coaching early childhood teachers: A systematic review of its effects on teacher instruction and child development. Review of Education, 10(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3343
Yildiz, E. P., Cengel, M. & Alkan, A., (2020), Current trends in education technologies research worldwide: Metaanalysis of studies between 2015-2020. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(3), 192-206. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267044.pdf
Yılmaz, E. (2019). Content analysis of master’s and doctoral dissertations on inclusive education in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(1), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2402
Youngs, P., & Lane, J. (2014). Involving teachers in their own professional development. L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche, & K. L. Bauserman (Ed.), in Handbook of Professional Development in Education /Successful Models and Practices, PreK – 12 (s. 284-303). The Guilford Press.
Zepeda, S. J., Parylo, O. & Ilgan, A. (2013). Teacher peer coaching in Amerikan and Turkish schools. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/20466851311323096
Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Osman Aktan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
